At Consigliere University, calamity is never a failure — it is a branding opportunity.

The senior team proudly subscribes to a motto known the world over: “No Reverse Gear, We Double Down.”

What begins as a minor workplace incident — the sort most institutions resolve quietly over an afternoon — is instead elevated into a million-pound court case. Not because the issue is complex, but because resolution would require the one thing the University refuses to provide: admitting it might have been wrong.

Mistakes are not corrected, they are fortified. Evidence, no matter how glaring, is recast as a matter of interpretation. If a favoured professor encounters a difficulty, reports are commissioned to dilute or dismiss the facts, conclusions are turned upside down, and Wonderland logic prevails.

At Consigliere, the institutional instinct is simple: if challenged, escalate; if exposed, deny; if cornered, spend more and more money until the problem becomes too expensive for anyone to question.

Communications operate on a doctrine of controlled aggression. Dissenters are verbally dismantled, at volume. The strategy is clear: intimidate the narrative into submission and hope the facts lose confidence along the way. It is one of the few areas in which the once-brilliant Consigliere University can still claim world-leading status.

Leadership achieves a paradox. Alice, the Vice-Chancellor, is both omnipresent and absent — a distant, unavailable presence, even when physically in the room. The senior team beneath her resembles an academic ghost town, with key roles unfilled for months or years because no candidate is ever deemed sufficiently exceptional to join the party. The March Hare, the Mad Hatter and the Dormouse run the show with confident aplomb. Decision-making becomes less a process and more a prolonged stalemate, punctuated by bursts of expensive urgency when matters spiral.

And yet, through it all, the motto endures: “No Reverse Gear — We Double Down.”

At Consigliere University, this is not resilience; it is doctrine. Small problems are nurtured into crises, crises are escalated into calamities, and accountability is treated as something best handled by their lawyers — who, it must be said, are doing very well indeed for themselves. The result is an institution that does not collapse so much as it continually reinvents the conditions for its own catastrophes: well-funded, supremely confident and entirely convinced it is doing an excellent job, while the staff (and the rest of the world) look on in quiet wonder.

At Consigliere, as it lurches from crisis to crisis, the senior team are confident that the problems lie with the managed, not the management.

As the March Hare snapped at the close of yet another emergency senior management meeting, “If it’s failing, we simply haven’t doubled down hard enough.” Alice, without looking up, added: “And if it collapses entirely, we shall call it a “Reimagining Consigliere University” — and commission a report confirming our success.”

Ah, Serious craziness. Just a fable. Consigliere University does not exist.

Categories: Blog

19 Comments

21percent.org · 24 July 2026 at 19:43

On the matter in the headlines, the problems lie in Human Resources division, the Research Integrity Office and the Communications Office. Like Consigliere, they have no reverse gear. They just hit the gas and continue to accelerate.

There was no reason for this to happen in such a public way. We feel sorry for the individual caught in the middle of it.

    TheResearcher · 24 July 2026 at 19:55

    The individual caught in the middle of it can come forward, apologize, namely to those he plagiarised from, and move forward. If he does not do it, he is no different from those who covered up.

Wonderland · 24 July 2026 at 19:50

The Queen of Hearts is heavily promoted at ConsiglieriU. She loves arbitrary, tyrannical power and political injustice! Alice therefore features her prominently at ConsiglieriU website! The Queen of Hearts has no substance, no CV worthy of note, but she thrives by making false allegations against worthy colleagues so she destroys them and takes their place.

    Sad · 24 July 2026 at 19:52

    Queen Jean? Or another?

      WONDERLAND · 24 July 2026 at 21:43

      She is a childish, foul-tempered monarch whom Carroll himself describes as “a blind fury”, and who is quick to give death sentences at even the slightest of offenses

    TheResearcher · 24 July 2026 at 22:10

    Some of the comments are surreal:

    “Personally, I surely think that if you acknowledge your sources, which Arday has done, it’s not cheating? His employers have judged that he hasn’t. They’re my thoughts on the matter. ”

    His current employer is Cambridge University, the Cover Up University!

TwoTierJustice · 24 July 2026 at 21:58

A big problem for the university (as alluded to in last thread) is the O’Reilly case. His plagiarism seems minor in comparison with Arday’s, yet the outcome for O’Reilly seems to be very different

Reposted “However William O’Reilly hasn’t been able to co-opt his victimhood to avoid accountability, for years, like Arday has. There’s an entire webpage about Arday (arasite.org). The author made several attempts to alert the university and was ignored to the point he or she had to start a webpage about it.

The Office of Research Integrity (Rhys Morgan) says Arday’s plagiarism isn’t Cambridge’s problem. So obviously Cambridge has known all about Arday but kept shoving the research misconduct under the rug, and they apparently gagged news stories about him.

Compare Arday’s egregious case with WOR’s case and ask yourself why the completely bipolar reactions by Cambridge? One reason might be that WOR has some haters in his department (known for in-fighting), and these haters are powerful. Another reason might be, if you check the biography of the VC, she has close ties to History through her husband, a former historian at Princeton. Might WOR’s haters be pals with the VC or her husband?”

PressWatch · 25 July 2026 at 06:05

The Daily Mail have their piece out

https://www.dailymail.com/news/article-16003587/Plagiarism-jealousy-youngest-black-professor-Cambridge-life-story.html

You can also view it here

https://archive.is/7lvL5#selection-1527.0-1555.121

Daily Mail comments section will now explode, as these people are barely sane. Intereting to see if the G touches this story, my guess no

And the FT are busy with another Cambridge academic

    TheResearcher · 25 July 2026 at 07:00

    “FT are busy with another Cambridge academic”

    Not very hard to know who the Cambridge academic is; we do not need BreakerMorant for this one! 😂

    But will FT update and apologize for their pathetic ranking? Is UCam still the “UK’s Best Employer”?

      BreakerMorant · 25 July 2026 at 07:22

      **** BREAKING ****

      The pieces are moving behind the scenes. Keep watching. Not everything will surface all at once.

      The scandal is building. We haven’t yet seen the rotten core.

      The Breaker is always at work. There’s always much more to break.

        TheResearcher · 25 July 2026 at 07:42

        I know! But please, do not forget POLIS! 😂

        I have been waiting for an article in the Guardian on it since July 2025 and nothing… I even asked the Head of Department about that article and they I got investigated!

Sad · 25 July 2026 at 06:14

The attacks are broadening. The Daily Mail has more material than just the Cofnas piece. The press are now starting to dig.

Which brings us back to the criticism of Dave Harris, an expert and published author on ‘critical race theory’, the deeply divisive ideology that sees blackness as victimhood and whiteness as oppression and which has taken root in so many British educational establishments, including Cambridge.
Three years ago, he wrote to Professor Arday about some of his papers, admitting to ‘confusion’ over data he provides.

He was particularly struck by a 2022 paper about mental health among students in which Arday quotes a 38-year-old Latin-American academic talking about her struggles learning English.

According to Dr Harris, she uses many of the same words attributed to an Asian undergraduate he quotes in a 2018 study. Both talk about their fear of being ‘heavily medicated’.

Elsewhere, Dr Harris notes ‘several unorthodox spelling and grammatical constructions’, such as ‘boarder’ for ‘border’ and ‘curricula’ for ‘curricular’.

He acknowledges that some of these inconsistencies can arise through speech recognition software, but suggests Arday has been ‘let down badly’ by his peer referees who failed to pick them up.
After having these ‘oddities’ pointed out, several journal administrators issued corrections to some of Arday’s material.

Also the Mail are looking at more of his life story claims

Nonetheless, the claims have also triggered questions about other aspects of Professor Arday’s life.

One was his assertion in an interview in 2023 with The Guardian newspaper – one of his biggest cheerleaders – that ‘he has barely slept over the past 15 years’ because he was ‘working through most nights, often on his academic and charity work, but sometimes just to make ends meet’.

All the more remarkable, you might think, when you consider that period must have included his endurance marathon running.

To that end, last night it emerged that Arday’s profile page at Anglia Ruskin University appears to have been quietly edited. On February 28, the page seemingly claimed he had run ‘600 miles in six days for charity’. By yesterday, this had been amended to achieving the same distance ‘in 12 days’.

As if pre-empting the criticism coming his way, Arday writes in his book that ‘the suggestion that I somehow wasn’t worthy of my success would be levied against me time and again’.

MyPennies · 25 July 2026 at 06:40

Alice — AQ : Mad Hatter – AH: March Hare – BV: Dormouse – MG

Sad · 25 July 2026 at 06:45

Also on yahoo news; from Prof David Harris.

I am mentioned in this article. Profs Cremin and Morgan of Cambridge ignored my (polite and tentative) identification of problems with some articles in May 2025. Prof Morgan said it was just not his concern because the articles were published before Arday took post They have not contacted me since so I had no idea they carried out any further investigation. I would like details of what they actually did.

My email, to LJMU, with some details of problems in the PhD, was also dismissed.I understand a full dossier of the ‘similarities’ between the theses was sent to them in 2025 and contained examples that ran to 80 pages.

Finally, I hope there is no suggestion that I am part of a ‘vile campaign’ or a racist attack on Prof Arday. My views on racism in Britain have been published recently and long extracts are available for all to read on Amazon: Harris D (2024) Critical Race Theory (CRT) and Social Science: a Critique”

VCwatch · 25 July 2026 at 06:48

Right, it seems like Prentice and her Gang have a major news story about to overwhelm them.

I’ve every confidence in them.

Has someone told Debs yet?

PressWatch · 25 July 2026 at 06:52

This almost reads as if Cambridge have been pranked. If so, it’s up there with the Sokal hoax.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sokal_affair

TheResearcher · 25 July 2026 at 07:17

On 30 December 2025, the 21 Group wrote:

“Universities are brand-driven institutions. Brand-dependent organizations unravel quickly when misconduct and corruption is exposed. The 21 Group predicts in ten years time, there will be Harvard Business School MBA course on “The Decline and Fall of Consigliere University”.”
https://21percent.org/?p=3097

Do we really need to wait 10 years for this course? The first 7 months of 2026 were brutal for Consigliere University, and some of its biggest scandals are not even out yet!

    Judge BS · 25 July 2026 at 08:14

    Perhaps now that Munir is returning to teaching he can propose this course at Judge. I am sure he has plenty of knowledge of the case study material!!!

Leave a Reply

Avatar placeholder

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *