
The 21 Group has extracted some statistics from the University of Cambridge’s End of Year Financial Reports. They make interesting reading.
- From 2019–2025, central administration spending more than doubled (£195m → £395m), while funding for academic departments fell by 8%, as shown here. In 2019, £2.33 went to teaching and research for every £1 on admin. Today, it’s just £1.04.
- The number of six-figure earners in Cambridge University tripled between 2019 and 2025.
- The total amount paid to senior figures earning in excess of £150,000 has increased from £7 million in 2019 to £37 million in 2025.
- Average pay for all staff has been static at ~ £49k for a decade. This figure is corrected for inflation.
- The vast majority of employees of Cambridge University are no better off than they were 10 years ago (though they are 10 years older). Career and salary progression has stalled for many.
- A growing gap in pay is emerging in the university with an elite of high earners and the rest of us.
- Some of those earning more than £100,000 are academics. This stark rise in pay for senior academics alongside flat salaries for early-career staff shows a distortion of priorities. The rewards should be shared out more equally.
- The most inflated and exorbitant salaries are reserved for the senior managers and executives (the Registrary, the HR Director, the Academic Secretary, the Pro Vice Chancellors and the Heads of School)
- All this is exemplified by a Vice Chancellor who is the highest paid in the United Kingdom, yet spends a lot of time telling the rest of us that pay is not important.
Given this background, we highlight again the interesting contribution made on the previous thread by Autophagy here
The corruption has advanced in several phases
1. In the first phase, senior administrators awarded themselves outsized salaries and benefits, as well as outsourcing contracts and favours
2. This generated resentment from other senior stakeholders, notably senior professors. The first solution was to add more senior executive roles in the administration and tell these professors that if they were “good” they too could join the golden club
3. This bought off some people (heads of school etc) but there weren’t enough positions to go around, leaving resentment among research professors
4. This resulted in any number of abusive practices as departments sought to pass down workload to junior academics, admin, postdocs while coercing them to give cuts of grants, publications and credit to senior profs
5. So then they raised salaries for senior professors, we ended up with a massive inflation of high (150k+) pay deals but nothing for basic admin staff or postdocs or lecturers
6. But the people at the bottom (programme admins, lecturers, postdoc team members) were the ones doing all the work and they’ve had enough, and no amount of short-term hires will fill the gap
7. So now the whole system is falling apart- the best scholars have left, the grants aren’t coming in, students are upset, and yet the nomenklatura still continues to expand
8. The legal cases pile up, the costs augment, and the university is failing as research output declines and the rankings finally catch up with reality
9. VC wants austerity but the cuts fall on the people doing all the work while the nomenklatura continues to drain resources
10. All the skeletons are coming out of the closet and no-one has a clue what to do. We need a total rebuild from scratch but it cannot be done because the people who birthed this mess are still running the show and running circles to keep the skeletons hidden
This is a summary with which the 21 Group is in complete agreement.
As teaching and research are squeezed ever tighter, bureaucracy expands with remarkable ease and consumes more and more of the resources. The institution increasingly views its academic purpose not as something to advance, but as something to contain. Until this contradiction is confronted, no narrative of excellence can succeed. The present management look unsuited to the task of fixing things because they are “the people who birthed this mess”.
6 Comments
TheResearcher · 27 January 2026 at 16:22
“All the skeletons are coming out of the closet and no-one has a clue what to do.”
Of course they do! The strategy remains exactly the same, one based on secrecy and cover-ups of misconduct. This culture is engrained in all the senior leadership that makes the decisions as if they did not know an alternative approach. You would think that because they know that the cases are piling up, that an increasing number of people external to the University—including MPs and journalists—are increasingly aware of the multiple scandals running in parallel, the senior leadership would at least slowdown on the malpractices. Is that true, 21 Group? Clearly not! Should we expect a reduction or stasis of malpractices with this leadership? Clearly not. Why am I sure?
Yesterday I was given more precautionary measures because I refuse to engage with dishonest people and to be silent when an 800-years institution burns around me. What were the new precautionary measures you may wonder? I was informed that my emails “will now be redirected for separate review.” Unfortunately for them, they cannot control my other email accounts, as they soon realized when I used another account to forward the news to the MPs ccing the leadership of UCam. Note that these new measures build on a surreal number of other measures made against me, including prohibiting me from contacting hundreds of people, limiting my use of my @cam account, ignoring my complaints and questions, sending me incorrect and misleading information on a regular basis, namely about my rights in the University, conducting a sham investigation against me after I reported serious malpractices by senior members, ignoring the fact that the people who apply the measures against me have conflicts of interest, dismissing, without any investigation, the whistleblowing disclosures and safeguarding referrals that third-parties have done about how University staff have treated me and have affected my health as given by detailed medical letters from my GP or even trying to frighten me with the idea that my “crimes” could be communicated to the police. This may well be a record of abuses against a single person but it is not enough for them!
The number of senior members aware of these malpractices is simply mind-blowing. Instead of addressing the problems, the University now wants to prevent that these members become further aware so that they cannot be implicated in the future so my emails “will now be redirected for separate review.” The real problem of UCam is not financial, but a complete loss of dignity and humanity by those who should manage this institution. While they remain, things will get worse and worse.
Eileen Nugent · 27 January 2026 at 17:55
“even trying to frighten me with the idea that my “crimes” could be communicated to the police” – communicating with the police i.e. piling additional pressure on a person will not change the facts of the original case, pilling additional pressure on a person will only serve to clarify the facts of the original case & the original case will then become even clearer. If a university has no real case to begin with then by the time it ends up with the police it will be extremely clear that the university had no real case to begin and that unnecessary work has been generated for the police. The most important thing to establish in any situation is whether the university has a clear case in the situation or whether what the university has is an individual in a particular role in the university who is generating situations that they are subsequently unable to remedy themselves and/or contribute to the remedy of by working with others in the university.
Eileen Nugent · 27 January 2026 at 18:34
“I want money, That’s what I want” – it’s like the King Midas myth, all that is irreplaceable & crucial in sustaining life is turned into one thing – gold/money – at which point that one thing is also left in a position where it is unable to play its own true function in sustaining life.
FlyingLizard · 27 January 2026 at 19:30
“I want money, That’s what I want” comes from here, I guess
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E-P2qL3qkzk
Eileen Nugent · 27 January 2026 at 20:17
Sometimes a persons love is the only thing paying another persons bills because it is the only thing holding a person in working conditions that they would otherwise be unable to sustain their own existence in.
Struggling · 27 January 2026 at 20:06
We all need money to get by. But a select few at the top have taken it all for themselves.